CHAPTER 8 - Buy One Get Three Free: The Four Loves Model in The Smoke Room
(Originally published - June 30th 2023)
It's common enough to say that Ancient Philosophy classified love into four kinds. This is, as always, an over-simplification, and one that breaks down with even the most cursory research. All sorts of classical philosophers had all sorts of different organizational schema about what love was. The "Four Loves" version comes to us filtered through Christian theologians and philosophers in the Late Classical through the Renaissance eras, and so to some extent is colored by that perspective. It's common for sources that organize love in this way to be visibly over-cautious of what they call Eros, or to try explicitly to say that Agape is both inherently superior to other forms of love and separated from sexuality entirely.
All that said, though, if we were to try to hold out only for Classical Philosophy which was wholly untainted by Christian influence, we'd have almost nothing, and it's not as if any of us--the people who are reading works of literary analysis, in English--can claim to come from cultures or societies wholly free of Christian influence. Trying to analyze according to a hypothetical influence-free schema that we don't have is only going to replace the version of it with someone else's bias with a version of it with our own biases. Even if it could be done, what would be the purpose? The schema exists, as it is, and so long as we are conscious of the perspectives that have shaped it, and so can correct for them as needed, then it will do as well as any other. The principal correction, and the one we will therefore establish at the outset, is this: it is common in treatments of this idea of types of love to proceed from the assumption that sex and romance are solely and entirely the domain of Eros, that Storge, Philia, and Agape have nothing whatsoever to do with sexuality. But I daresay that almost any queer person who wears a little experience can tell you this is pure, raw, heteronormative nonsense. If a kind of love exists, then it can be expressed sexually if those who hold it consent to do so: the difference between loves is not in whether sexuality is involved, it's in how that sexuality manifests.
So with the understanding that it's an imperfect instrument, let's take a look at what we're measuring with it.
The Smoke Room
is a visual novel produced by The Echo Project. The main character, Sam, is a sex worker, in a mining boom town, in rural mostly-Arizona, in 1915, and the story opens when he kills a client in self-defense. Sex work, somewhat counter-intuitively, is legal (this is true, historically, Arizona did not outlaw sex work until 1917,) but sodomy is a felony. Moreover, just because sex work is legal doesn't mean anyone is going to believe a sex worker's claim of self defense. So Sam needs to decide, and quickly, which of his other clients can get him out of town, cover up the crime, or both.
This choice also decides which of the possible romantic interests Sam will, on this playthrough, become attached to: Cliff, the visiting anthropologist from Europe, Murdoch, the closest-anyone-can-be-to-'out' photographer, Nik, the shy miner who can rarely afford more than cuddling, or Will, the town Sheriff. These are very different men, of course, and the relationships Sam can build with each are correspondingly different.
Perhaps intentionally, perhaps through mere synchronicity, these map to The Four Loves.
Storge
Will, or Sheriff William Adler, is Sheriff of Echo. He was once a prominent detective, in Chicago, but due to some kind of encounter with some combination of organized crime and corrupt politics--precise details are not yet known--he was essentially exiled.
We've had no evidence of any point in Will's life where he did not know he was gay, but nevertheless he does have an ex-wife and an estranged son. The marriage was, according to Will, right from the beginning unhappy to the point of suicidal ideation (though it's notable that Hattie, the lady in question, remains to this day hurt and confused as to why it ended) and as much as he misses Chicago, he was glad to be done with it.
He's gruff, grumpy, and blunt, and very assertive in bed. He flat out denies having romantic feelings toward Sam, at the same time physical tells--his tail involuntarily wagging, or an erection in reaction to a compliment from Sam--give that statement the lie. His love is instead expressed in acts of caretaking: making sure Sam doesn't skip meals, reassuring Sam that defending himself is justified and moving to cover up the killing, teaching Sam to better read people so he won't be tricked again. Moreover, he does these with a very casual, comfortable manner: he laughs at Sam's fears, he sarcastically complains, he and Sam stay up late together, not having sex, just talking. It's a very common observation that the two of them are the 'old married couple' of the cast.
Will here is going to represent Storge.
Storge (pronounced STORE-gay, yes really) is natural, instinctive, familial love. The love between parents and children would be a kind of Storge, as would be the love for pets, or siblings, or one's hometown. One translation might be affection, but perhaps the best way to get the concept across would be that if what you love about someone is that they've "always been there for you" then you are likely talking about Storge.
Storge, obviously, has applications to kinds of relationships beyond a romantic or sexual one, but its romantic or sexual form would inevitably look very like this: Hanging out at eachother's workplaces. Spending the night together even if they don't have sex--Will offers to pay Sam's normal rate to sleep with him even in only a purely literal sense--which, bookmark that, it's going to be seen again.
The theme of Will's route has been working out who one's real family is. That's the reason this route is the one in which all the other romantic interests remain most involved, and the one which (potentially) has been teased to have a possible ending in which some amount of romantic and/or sexual involvement exists between Sam and each of them. Any queer literary analyst worth their salt will tell you how important 'found family' is, as a concept, especially in the case of a story like this where it's unambiguously and very favorably being compared to a biological family. Will's familial relationship with his ex-wife Hattie, with his estranged son Andy, these have served only to hurt everyone involved, and the text clearly rejects the idea that reconciliation is the answer. This is not Will's real family, they never were. Will's real family is Sam, and by extension is Nik, is Murdoch and Cliff, is even Todd.
To extend the metaphor to them, note that parsing Will's sometimes heavy relationships in terms of familial bonds makes them make much more sense. Cliff, for example: Will heartily disapproves of how careless Cliff is with his closet, how his casual unmasking puts not only himself but Sam and Murdoch at risk. But he still defends and guards him without hesitation: Will is unceasingly aggravated with Cliff but never distances himself, as one would with a family member. In the course of his investigation Cliff, Murdoch, and each Nik look very suspicious, at times, but actually suspecting them does not seem to cross Will's mind, in an obvious continuity with his reaction to Sam's confession.
For his part, Will is showing parts of himself, his background, his trauma, his explanations of why he is as he is, to Sam that he's clearly never shown anyone. These wounds are all about having been denied Storge, and it is Storge, therefore, that he gets from Sam.
Eros
Clifford Tibbets is a scholar, from Batavia in Europe, who has come to Echo to complete an anthropology thesis on the Indigenous people of the area. He has heard, and been enamored of, the Meseta people all his life--these are a lightly fictionalized analogue of the Dine or Navajo people of the American southwest, but most national names are changed in this story: the Netherlands is Batavia, Germany is Almany, even the United States are 'of Columbia' rather than 'of America.'
Indigenous studies is not all that Cliff is enamored with. We in fact first see him in the story openly announcing that he'd like to hire a male sex worker, please, under the mistaken impression that because "this is the wild west" where "everything is free and rowdy" that therefore nobody will have any objections. He gets a beating for his trouble from two local drunks, but he does also get his introduction to Sam, who clues him in about there being such a thing as discretion.
He's enthusiastic, sheltered, irrepressible, and can be impatient. He's technically minor nobility, and his aristocratic mannerisms stand out all the more against the background of a mining boom town. He very much views the world, or at least the parts of it he's dealing with now, through rose colored glasses. He's also arguably the horniest, he's the only one, so far, to have slept with another of the romantic interests--he and Murdoch become a couple fairly quickly in Will's route--and he was the first to have a sex scene with multiple partners.
So he'll be Eros.
Eros needs little to no introduction. Most writing on The Four (or however many) Loves must start by explaining that there are kinds of love OTHER than Eros. Eros is romantic love, 'true' love, the kind of love you 'fall in.'
It's common to take a connection between Eros and sexuality for granted. Some sex-negative treatments will try to separate the two conceptually in order to avoid having to say that sex can be good, but I would argue for that separation on opposite grounds. Basic queer studies will make it clear that romantic love and sexual attraction are not the same thing: an Asexual person is not necessarily Aromantic, nor is an Aromantic person Asexual. Moreover, as already discussed above, any of these forms of love may be expressed sexually, which could not be the case if sexuality was the same thing as a particular one of them.
That said, Eros is the kind of love which is oriented toward sexuality, or rather the kind of love which one might usually have for sexual partners. There is a reason that the word "Erotic" derives from it.
Cliff is, of the four romantic interests, the one who has known Sam the least amount of time, and the only one to make it all the way to his bed motivated solely by sexual desire. Will and Nik already have feelings for Sam, Murdoch has been fantasizing about the life he imagines Sam lives for some time now, but Cliff has literally only just arrived in this part of the country, and came to the brothel looking for the male sex worker he knew was there before even meeting him. After one night, he immediately pays lavishly to hire Sam as his 'bodyguard' on an expedition to the reservation, despite still knowing nearly nothing about him. At the same time, Cliff's had at least one sexual encounter with Murdoch, as well, and according to player choices can continue pursuing both all the way into a polyamorous three way. He's got real difficulty concealing his feelings, and unfortunately, his orientation, which itself puts him at risk.
Moreover, when Cliff finally encounters the culture he came to study, the Meseta people, he's excited to the point of being off-putting and overbearing. He loves everything about their way of life, even as he admits he knows nigh-nothing about them. He has to be gently but firmly reminded that the things he's being shown aren't priceless museum pieces, they're real people's real, daily lives. Disillusioning him about the justifiability of American colonialism is an increasing priority of the ongoing story.
All the ways he relates to Sam, to Murdoch, to his own expedition, and to what he believes to be the freedom of the American frontier reek of infatuation. He's fallen in love at first sight, and only in hindsight does he actually think of the consequences, whether that means dealing with the fact that Sam can't return with him because he may be wanted for murder, or reckoning with being entangled in acts of genocide against the people he came here to get to know. "Wed in haste, repent at leisure" is descriptive not only of the way he relates to Sam, but of the way he relates to everything.
Philia
Murdoch Byrnes is the only (surviving) son of the Byrnes family. His father is the owner of the general store and his mother is the principal of the town school. He's witty, fast talking, intelligent, and mischievous, but this is a facade, a persona he adopts to cover up how desperate he is for the approval of his increasingly abusive and exploitative family. He does nearly all the work at the store, as his father is beginning to exhibit symptoms of dementia, especially the photography. He's continually and publicly blamed and berated by his mother for everything that might happen to go wrong, even if he had nothing to do with it. All of which is to say nothing of the things Sam comes to learn as he gets closer to Murdoch.
Murdoch is also the only romantic option who is already well aware that some presence is haunting the town of Echo. He's discovered in his work that the photographs can change, that sometimes they show hurtful or frightening imagery that has disappeared when you look back. And that the things the presence makes you see can be dispelled with sex, or with certain drugs, though other drugs actually make it worse. This has kindled in him the hope that the years of increasing emotional abuse he's taken from his family are similarly of paranormal origins, though Sam and by extension the reader remains unconvinced of this.
Murdoch has deep issues with performative identity and transactional relationships. He's so used to being whoever the person he's dealing with wants him to be, to doing whatever they want him to do, that he's no longer sure who he is when he's by himself: he's so unwilling to say no that he's been talked, by his sister, into letting her fiance fuck him to keep him entertained long enough to go through with the wedding, and instead of objecting he rationalizes to himself why it's not so bad, really, and actually he likes it. As much as this hurts him, he does it because he's so starved for affection or approval that trading anything for either is worth it. The most he can imagine wishing for, during his confessional breakdown to Sam, is getting 'a kiss for free,' and being told he's 'doing a good job.'
Murdoch embodies Philia.
According to some accounts, Philia was the noblest of the loves. It was the engaged, active, mutual admiration of equals. It's the Phil in Philosophy's 'love of wisdom,' and in Philadelphia's 'city of brotherly love.' While it's often translated 'friendship,' the English word covers a much broader range of relationship types than 'Philia,' only the very top range of what we'd call 'friendship' could properly be called Philia. We don't just mean "small talk in the break room" here, or "roommates who get along well enough.'
The challenge in trying to describe 'friendship' in an analysis of a queer story about queer characters is the wearisome frequency with which heteronormative society would reduce historical same sex couples to 'just friends.' It is well to remember that, as Murdoch proves, Philia is just as much real love as any other, and can just as much expressed sexually, but this doesn't help clarify the distinctions.
Instead of examples, then, let us talk in terms of the things Philia does which other forms of love do not. Storge loves the beloved for the care and comfort and peace they provide. Eros loves the beloved because loving them is pleasure. But Philia loves the beloved for their own sake, just because they are themselves, and not for any other good which is a consequence of them or their actions. So in order to exist between people they need to be equals, not like Storge's carer and cared-for. And they must see eachother for who they are, unlike Eros which thrives in first impressions and behind rose-colored glasses. Hence Murdoch, in order to get close to Sam, must see past the illusion of orgiastic bliss he's imagined of him to the real man. And he cannot be loved by Sam without having his own self-image blown away and his truth revealed. Philia is anti-transactional, and recall, what Murdoch craves above all else is non-transactional love, a kiss for free, to be loved not in exchange for something, but simply for himself.
Phila, also, is perhaps the busiest love. Storge wants to be comfortable, Eros wants to lie about gazing into eachother's eyes, but Philia wants to do something together. Philia wants to stay up all night talking, or co-write a opera, or play games, or build a railroad together. Philia wants to see the potential of the beloved realized, so it wants a project for them, and then wants to help with that project. Thus, Murdoch is the only partner who does not start off by hiring Sam, but rather challenging him, and besting him, at a sexual contest. He offers him a part time job, he involves him in his ongoing paranormal investigation. When Sam finally gets through to him about the abuse in which his family has left him, it is in the context of Murdoch seeing that he too has been used as, in all practicality, a sex worker like Sam.
Agape
Nikolai Krol is a miner at the gold, silver, and copper mine which supports most of the town's economy. Like all the miners, he's paid barely a subsistence wage. He's doing his best to help organizing a union, which given that this is 1915 involves serious risk of being shot by pinkertons or the national guard.
Nikolai is an immigrant from Lachia (ie Poland). He came to America as a young man, and though he hasn't given Sam the story of how it was clearly not exactly a voluntary relocation. Given the historical period, the partition of Poland between Prussia and Russia, and the fact that now those two powers are fighting world war one on it, and his demonstrated familiarity with early communist and socialist theory, and the fact that he speaks with disturbing familiarity on how private property is a myth because 'all it takes is men with guns' to make all your rights disappear, it's not hard to speculate about what tragedies he might have behind him.
Nik's poverty means he can't exactly afford Sam's regular rates. Sam still takes him as a customer, though, just because Nik is genuinely nice to him, because Nik usually just wants to cuddle, and because has feelings for Nik as well. Nik feels very guilty about this, worried that Sam is missing money he needs to spend time with him: he fantasizes about being able to provide for Sam on a permanent basis because then he won't feel unworthy of his love:
"But I have felt frightened, thinking any time I hold you can be the last time. Because you need to work. And I need to find somebody I do not have to pay to hold. Or find some way... to pay to hold you forever."
It's notable that Nik's fantasies are not simple domesticity. When he describes the kind of life he wants, it's not just him and Sam--though note that Nik is the only one, thusfar, to give the equivalent of a marriage proposal to Sam, even if as he does he points out 'there is no marriage for people like you and me.' Rather, the perfect life Nik would choose if he but had the power goes beyond romance or even polyamory:
"I just want to drink with them, and cook with them, and do a good day's work for a good day's pay until we share our last summer... I'm not afraid of death. I'm more afraid of having to start over too many times before my last summer. I just want a slow cozy gentle run before I have to sleep for good. I want my neighbors leaving flowers by my bed. Not faceless strangers passing by."
He doesn't specify who "them" is, presumably the Union Boys, his friends, his neighbors, and Sam, who he's already by now said he wants to spend the rest of his life with, unconditionally, no matter what.
Nik, the one character of whom I've never heard any reader express any dislike, is Agape.
That's not 'a-gape,' that's 'A-ga-pe.' Rhymes with "a top, eh?"
Agape is unconditional love. Christianized treatments of the classifications of love will depart from more classical ones by ranking this the 'highest' and 'purest,' often they will call this divine love, or the kind of 'your neighbor as yourself' love that christian scripture commands. What's useful is this account is the 'your neighbor.' It does not say your family member, as in Storge, your sexy neighbor, as with Eros, or your free and equal neighbor with whom you have common interests, as in Philia. It's 'your neighbor,' unmodified. Whoever happens to be there, whether they deserve it or need it. Love without means testing.
Note that not only is Nik's love for Sam unconditional, his loyalty to his friends is as well. He speaks up in favor of Will, even when the other unionists are automatically and very justifiably suspicious of a cop.
The most common translation of Agape is 'Charity,' from the latin 'caritas' which was their often-taken option to translate Agape from greek. But one might also argue for 'Solidarity.'
This of course makes a unionist an obvious embodiment of Agape, but more than this, Nik is community-minded to his core. The ideals he advances, the way he packs extra food 'just in case' someone is going hungry, his hesitancy to support violent organizing tactics even as he acknowledges they might be necessary. Agape, as an ethos, is one of the most powerful community building tools in existence, from the early christians to the hippies at haight ashbury to any number of nascent cults.
Note that the one rift between Nik and Sam (that we see, at least) is not because of any way either wrongs the other. Will's route is unique in that all the other characters remain involved in the story, roughly as a group. After the route begins by Sam choosing to confide in Will, however, Nik becomes somewhat distant and cool. But it's not that Sam killed a man, or that he lied to cover it up that hurt, it's that Sam thought Nik's love might be conditional. As Nik explains to Will, "he should know that he can trust me."
Also note that there is nothing chaste about Nik's love for Sam. While many treatments try to present Agape as sexlessly spiritual, Nik is arguably the single most passionate lover Sam has. Cliff is experimenting with the act itself, Murdoch is playful and wry, Will is working through his self-loathing via his kinks, but Nik, even in the midst of orgasm, only repeats "I love you, Sam Ayers."
Intention or Depiction?
The question is, is this intentional theming on the part of the author? Or is this merely an emergent property of the story as a result of The Four Loves being a real observed phenomena in human life which would therefore naturally be reflected in a story with four possible romantic partners? Well, there's one additional aspect that might serve as a test.
Each route has a side character specific to that route. On Will's route we meet his deputy, Todd Bronson. Cliff's has Jeb Coles, the local teamster hired for his expedition. Murdoch has Ralph Walker, the store pharmacist and flatmate who was once his boyfriend. And Nik has Feng Yaolin, or Yao, the serious-minded and covert union organizer. All are queer in some way. Thusfar Sam is able to become involved, sexually, with two (maybe two point five?) of them in addition to the main route's love interest.
The question is, since these characters are clearly associated with a single specific route, do they also correspond to the four loves? To the correct one for that route?
Deputy Todd Bronson
is a precious cowboy himbo who hero-worships Will a little--he mentions that, masturbatory fantasies about "the things he knows Will and Sam are doing for eachother" notwithstanding, he thinks of Will as a surrogate father--and always sees the best in everyone which means he's maybe not best suited for a career in law enforcement. His love of pie is memetic. He's a good mormon boy, which is a problem, because Sam's arrival in Will's life, Cliff's gender-nonconforming presence in the social circle, and his own hopefully careful pre-marital celibacy have led him to start asking questions about his own body, Sam's professional expertise is the only available source of answers in coming to terms with the possibility of not being straight.
Todd is deeply loyal to the idea of his town and the people in it as he remembers believing them to be growing up here. Even when he knows and acknowledges that those memories are deliberately sweetened. Take the case of Marcy and Huxley Greene, a childless married couple who are friends of the family via one off Todd's many, many uncles. Marcy has been trapped in a horribly abusive marriage since she was, well, young enough to play with dolls, as Todd puts it, they've been "married since he was a kid," when she's only barely older than Todd himself. But he doesn't feel like he can do anything about it, because it'd upset his family. Like Will, Todd has been placed in an unhealthy biological family, and may yet have the option before him of replacing it with a found family. So Todd can be seen to represent a toxic, abusive form of Storge, one in which he's been trapped. Which makes that a match.
Jebediah Coles
is a local rancher who makes most of his living as a hired teamster, hauling cargo with a team of donkeys. He's in many ways a polar opposite of Cliff: reserved, taciturn, phlegmatic, and not eager to get to know anyone. When some manner of paranormal entity attacks Cliff's expedition and kills his donkeys he takes it very hard. The animals, you see, once belonged to his boyfriend. At some point, when Jeb was younger, he and a Meseta hired hand on the family ranch were in love. They planned to save up, leave Echo, spend the rest of their lives together, but these hopes were dashed when the partner died of tuberculosis. Now the animals are the only thing he has left from him, he'd promised to take care of them, and now he's failed at that too.
We actually know very little about Jeb, as side characters go, and even less about his once lover--not even a name. But their relationship is, or was, so obviously Eros as to approach cliche. Young sweethearts, full of big dreams of running away and building a life together, cut tragically short, leaving the bereaved survivor to grieve and pine and they withdraw into solitude and vainly cherish the last relics of their beloved. That makes two matches.
Ralph Walker
(not entirely confirmed that this is his last name, it doesn't seem to appear in the text, and though members of the community assure me the writer has revealed this surname I was unable to source that claim) is a childhood friend of the Byrnes siblings, Murdoch especially. He emigrated from Australia, seemingly on the initiative of Alfred Byrnes, the father, to study pharmacology and manage the general store's pharmacy desk. Murdoch has confirmed they were once a couple but are so no longer, yet they still room together, investigate the entity haunting Echo together, and apparently masturbate together while talking about Sam. Ralph is much less reticent than Murdoch, and frequently attempts to protect Murdoch from being taken advantage of, though he unfortunately can't do anything about the most exploitative people in Murdoch's life, his parents, as he's still an employee.
Ralph is an instance of a type of stock queer character that used to be much more common but has become less so as literature in general has grown more comfortable with the idea that we're real people: the confidante who tells the truth that nobody else will admit because he is the only one with nothing to lose. A lot of the background characters in Evelyn Waugh novels, for example, fit this archetype. While not so very likable, and sometimes outright insulting, his insults and unlikability are still in the service of trying to protect Murdoch, often from himself. He's a co-investigator and co-worker just as much as Sam is, and has been longer. It's perhaps worth a raised eyebrow that he and Murdoch are exes yet still cohabitate, yet it must be admitted that 'remaining friends, sometimes even ones with benefits, after a breakup' is hardly an uncommon situation in queer society: certainly much more than in heteronormative society. Most interestingly, their breakup was apparently occasioned by Ralph going away to college to complete his education: ie, going to Do Something alone, without Murdoch. That brings the score to three.
Which leaves Yao.
Feng Yaolin
is a Huaxian (ie. Chinese) immigrant and a very serious union organizer. He is aloof and businesslike where Nik is affectionate, but he is also queer, if Sam offers him a handjob he accepts with very little coaxing. Yao is deeply dedicated to his ideals and to his mission of building a better life for the mine workers, but he never seems to be particularly friendly with any of them. Even Chang, another Huaxian immigrant, a former miner until he lost fingers in an accident, who to all appearances may have been his partner and might one day be so again, gets little more than 'concern expressed as disapproval.' Some have read Yao as Aromantic, and it may turn out that the text supports this reading.
To place Yao, we need to cover an aspect of Agape that has not yet been mentioned, as it was not at all relevant to the characterization of Nik. Agape is unconditional, universal love, and moreover it is love which seeks the good of the person loved, completely regardless of any benefit to the lover. Other loves aim at the lover's happiness, or the lover and beloved's mutual happiness, but Agape wants good things for the beloved solely because it's good for them to have those things. In this form it has been described as high, cold, inhuman clarity, the kind of mindset that leads people to face firing squads with a smile. So this activist and possible revolutionary may not seem to get any particular joy out of the steps he takes toward the better future for his community. But his own feelings are irrelevant to the work. He does not mourn. He organizes.
That's all four. Yet now I realize this may not answer the question. Yes, it may seem likely, if both the main and secondary character of a story are demonstrations of the same genus of love, that this was done deliberately. But it remains perfectly possible that this is exactly what one would expect from a narrative that splits four ways into four different love stories: each of those would have to be about the love specific to Sam and Will/Cliff/Murdoch/Nik, and that love has to be some kind of love. A competent writer will strive to make the different stories feel distinct from one another, and if the human experience of love really is classifiable into four, then those may very well be the lines along which such distinction naturally occurs. This would mean, then, pitting that love against the kind of obstacles and dramatic tensions suitable to it. Which would mean that a secondary character, who would also be concerned with those obstacles and dramatic tensions, would therefore develop organically along similar lines.
But then, the purpose of literature is not to puzzle out the author's secret thoughts, but to experience the story and build an understanding of it that the text supports. And if we can prove nothing else, we have certainly proved it does support a reading themed around this anatomy of the types of love.
No comments yet. Be the first!